The young man seemed a bit dazed, and I felt a tiny bit
badly about not giving him a chance to make his pitch. So I apologized, and asked him to present his
reasons why he thinks Mr. Blair should be elected County Executive.
He responded that he really did not have anything to say,
that he was new at this job. I then
asked why he was taking the time to go door-to-door for Mr. Blair. He said that he was friends of Mr. Blair’s
family. I said that that was nice, but asked why he thinks we should elect Mr. Blair to be County Executive. No answer, but it turned out that he was being
paid.
I complimented him on getting involved in civic affairs, and
urged him next time to examine the candidate and the issues before
campaigning.
The conventional wisdom is that the Washington Post endorsement of Mr. Blair gives him the edge in the race against five long-time office holders, particularly since it only takes a plurality to win the nomination. Maybe so. But this encounter with Mr. Blair's "grass-roots" operation reinforces my belief that nominating him would be a mistake. I will vote for the best candidate who appears to be most likely to secure the plurality.
(NB: I think this year's experience shows that in Montgomery County, we need to have run-offs in the primaries, if no one gets a majority.)
No comments:
Post a Comment