Saturday, May 7, 2022

Metro DC PFLAG Montgomery County District 3 BOE Candidate Questionnaire Answers

 In recent years, the Montgomery County Public Schools system (MCPS) has made great progress with respect to LGBTQ matters.  MCPS policy, of course, is set by the Montgomery County Board of Education.  Below is the Questionnaire that the Metro DC Chapter of  PFLAG sent to all 2022 candidates for the Board of Education.  Scroll down for the answers provided by District 3 Candidates Scott Joftus and Julie Yang.  Candidate Marcus Alzona did not submit any responses (Answers from the At-Large, District 1, and District 5 candidates may be found here, here, and here).   For those seeking more context, I suggest checking out the links provided in the Questionnaire itself.

NOTE:  In the July 19 primary election, the top two vote-getters move on to the general election in November. Voters may vote in all the contests, regardless of where in the County they live.

David S. Fishback, Co-Chair for Maryland Advocacy
Metro DC Chapter of PFLAG

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

For many years, the Metro DC Chapter of PFLAG has worked cooperatively with MCPS and the Board of Education to work foster a positive environment for Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender, and Gender Non-Conforming students.

 

In order to inform our members and supporters of the viewpoints of the candidates running to serve on the Board of Education, we respectfully request that you answer the five brief questions pasted below.  In order to provide a context, we include background materials.  As a 501(c)(3) organization, we will not be endorsing candidates for office, but we will pass along your answers, and anything else you would like to let us know, to our members and supporters.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

 

Thank you,

 

David S. Fishback, Maryland Advocacy Co-Chair

Metro DC PFLAG

 

cc:  Mark Eckstein, Maryland Advocacy Co-Chair, Metro DC PFLAG

  

 

1.  HEALTH EDUCATION CURRICULUM

 

Background

 

The secondary school Family Life and Human Sexuality curriculum provides that with respect to matters of sexual orientation and gender identity, the lessons are not “scripted” (as they were prior to 2014), but rather that “instructional planning resources [are] developed similar to all other content areas, including sample learning tasks, suggested instructional resources, and teacher guidance (e.g., the American Psychological Association’s Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality, available at http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.pdf.  This shift permits teachers to plan instruction based on the specific needs of their students, as they do in all other content areas.” See  https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/c4cf1644198dfd9986257503000d636f/4e99ac91837305c887257cd1006d30ed/$FILE/6%201%20Sec%20Health%20Ed%20Curr%20Framework.pdf (pp. 5-6), adopted by the Board of Education on June 17, 2014.

 

Question

 

What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

 

 

 2.  ANTI-DISCRIMINATION

 

Background

 

MCPS guidelines and regulations make it very clear that the Board of Education “expects all students and staff to conduct themselves in a manner that demonstrates mutual respect without regard to an individual’s actual or perceived personal characteristics, such as . . . gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, [and] family/parental status.” See, for example, A Student’s Guide to Rights and Responsibilities, 2021-22  and Employee Code of Conduct, 2021-22. 

 

With respect to gender identity and expression, MCPS provides specific Guidelines.  See Guidelines Regarding Student Gender Identity, 2021-22

 

Question

  

What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?

 

 

 3.   SUPPORT FOR LGBTQ STUDENTS

 

Background

 

On February 4, 2020, the Board of Education’s Committee on Special Populations reviewed its Support for LGBTQ Students Update.  This review included discussion of MCPS initiatives for support of LGBTQ Students.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/c4cf1644198dfd9986257503000d636f/2687cea280a07e5985258504005b4a33/$FILE/200204%20LGBTQ%20Students%20Update.pdf

 

Question

 

What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?

 

 4.   SCHOOL NAMING

 

Background

 

In 2018, the Board of Education decided to name the new Richard Montgomery Cluster Elementary School after Bayard Rustin, a gay African American civil rights activist who was instrumental to organizing the 1963 March of Washington, which became the platform for Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.  https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/publicinfo/Bayard-Rustin.aspx

 

Question

 

What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?

 

 5.   ATTEMPTS TO BAR DISCUSSION OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR GENDER EXPRESSION.

 

Background

 

In some parts of the country, efforts are being made to prohibit public schools from discussing or even mentioning sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.  See, for example, https://www.npr.org/2022/02/09/1079541236/florida-dont-say-gay-bill and https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/02/09/pete-buttigieg-florida-dont-say-gay-bill-lgbtq-youth-impact-nr-vpx.cnn

 

Question

 

What is your view of these efforts?

 

 6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO.


CANDIDATE RESPONSES:


Scott Joftus

1.  What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

In 2014, the decision was made by MCPS, with substantial input from community members and other stakeholders, to revise the health education curriculum for all middle and high school students. Not only did these revisions allow for greater personalization of lesson materials, but also furthered the district’s goal to ensure that material closely aligned with the MCPS Strategic Planning Framework, the Common Core, and the National Health Education Standards (NHES). The stronger commitment to these standards, specifically the NHES, resulted in students having access to valid information, time to demonstrate their ability to solve personal problems and set goals related to their wellness, and the ability to analyze the numerous interpersonal and intrapersonal factors that impact individuals’ health. By including information from medical and mental health professional associations, students are exposed to information that is accurate, research-based, and aids in achieving the results set out by the NHES and MCPS Framework. Relying on expert advice is also important when dealing with potentially sensitive subject material, as it decreases the likelihood of misinformation or biased information being shared in the classroom. Teachers are experts in many different areas, but it is unreasonable to expect them to know everything about all medical and mental health areas as well. By using accredited and well-respected resources, teachers are able to provide students with important knowledge and help them better understand themselves and those around them.

 

2.  What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?

MCPS has long been committed to fostering a safe, equitable, and inclusive environment for all students, staff, and faculty. This commitment extends to students and employees who identify as a part of the LGBTQ community. I think the Gender Identity Guidelines, published this year, reaffirm this commitment and provide tangible, clear resources for the community. There are a few characteristics that I want to highlight in this guide that I believe are especially important and I am glad were included:

1.     The emphasis on working with the individual student to understand their comfort level in terms of their name and pronouns, communication with family, and participation in school-wide activities

2.     The acknowledgement of the greater threat that LGBTQ students face for bullying and harassment, and the numerous policies and procedures put in place by the Board of Education and MCPS to prevent and address these issues

3.     The clarification on common terms used within the LGBTQ community to foster understanding and a foundational knowledge base for the community.

MCPS makes it very clear that harassment of any sort is not acceptable. By not only creating a separate document of guidelines for gender identity, but also including numerous statements against discrimination in both the Employee Code of Conduct and Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook, they further their pledge for an equitable and unbiased school environment for all.

 

3.  What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?

I am very pleased with the measures that MCPS and the Board of Education have taken to improve the education and experience of LGBTQ students in the district. Specifically, the school leader professional development trainings and opportunities for LGBTQ students to discuss curriculum and take part in the Pride Association demonstrate commitment at all levels of the district, not just at the top. Further, by committing to review all subject material for inclusive content and ways to incorporate more diverse experiences, all students – regardless of whether they associate with the LGBTQ community or not – will have the chance to learn about an often-marginalized group. In order to build an accepting and tolerant community, it is imperative that students be exposed to a wide variety of people that may be different from themselves. These initiatives take great steps towards accurately representing the LGBTQ community in the schools, and with continued administrative and staff support, demonstrate MCPS’s and the Board of Education’s desire to celebrate the diversity of their community.

 

4.  What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?

I am extremely pleased with the decision to name the latest addition to MCPS after Bayard Rustin. While all the options for the name of the new school were great leaders and activists, Rustin stands apart as one of the main organizers for the 1963 March on Washington, and for staying true to himself and his identity as a gay man during a time in which individuals could be arrested on “morals charges” for being homosexual. He also saw the parallels between the Civil Rights struggle and gay rights movement, and tried to use both of those aspects of his identity to create positive change for others. The decision of the Board of Education to name the school after this man points clearly at their desire to embrace diversity in all forms, and I am proud to support their choice.

 

5. What is your view of [“Don’t Say Gay”] efforts?

The “Don’t Say Gay” bill in Florida, which passed in the House of Representatives on Thursday, February 24th, is a law that aims to diminish the lived experiences of the LGBTQ community and make it harder for students and staff who identify as members of the LGBTQ community to feel safe and accepted in their schools. It is a clear sign of prejudice and discrimination against a community that already has higher rates of bullying and harassment than straight, cisgender individuals. Students of all ages deserve to see themselves in the classroom texts, and to be celebrated for the traits that make them different, not attacked for them. Regardless of whether sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression is taught in the classroom, students will still have interactions with transgender individuals, homosexual individuals, and non-binary individuals. It is the job of public education to responsibly and equitably educate everyone in order to create a more tolerant society. By prohibiting this instruction, Florida public schools will fail to live up to this responsibility, and I do not support their actions.

 

6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO HERE:
I am proud that as a current board member, I am working with my colleague Lynne Harris to include LGBTQ as a special status (along with, for example, minority or woman owned) for consideration in all contracting.  This will make it easier for firms led by individuals identifying as LGBTQ to secure contracts with MCPS.  

Julie Yang

1.  What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

It is my position that all segments of the MCPS Health Education Curriculum should remain in place for inclusion for our students. Any updates to that information should be addressed through normal procedures. 


2.  What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?
It is important, perhaps now more than ever, that these anti-discrimination policies be followed and addressed when and if they are violated. A policy, such as this one, is of no value if not enforced by appropriate parties. 

3.  What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?
I support creating a more inclusive and just school environment for all students by elevating student voices, providing professional development opportunities for staff/teachers and other measures. This is something that we need to do for All students. One of the issues that I care a lot about is mental health. To have an inclusive and respectful school environment is essential to student mental health. See my opinion piece in Bethesda Beat here.

4.  What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?
The Bayard Rustin ES naming was both timely and appropriate. Though there was some opposition, I think it was the right thing to do. Many felt it was long overdue. 

5.  What is your view of ["Don't Say Gay"] efforts?
I think it is dangerous that current efforts to deny discussion of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression are taking place around the country. The LGBTQ community needs to be understood and respected like any other. If indeed, this community is the face of the most recent civil rights movement, we owe to all of our students, regardless of age, to be aware of the rights of their peers and families to be treated fairly like any others.

6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO HERE:
I affirmatively support the equal rights of all our students to have a quality education to increase their achievements and prepare them for college, career and life. As an immigrant and a member of a minority group, I have first hand experience and deep understanding of the importance of an inclusive and respectful school climate. I pledge to support and work towards a more inclusive and respectful school climate to all students and staff regardless of one's culture, language, country of origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. 





Metro DC PFLAG Montgomery County District 5 BOE Candidate Questionnaire Answers

In recent years, the Montgomery County Public Schools system (MCPS) has made great progress with respect to LGBTQ matters.  MCPS policy, of course, is set by the Montgomery County Board of Education.  Below is the Questionnaire that the Metro DC Chapter of  PFLAG sent to all 2022 candidates for the Board of Education.  Scroll down for the answers provided by the District 5 Candidates, in alphabetical order, Valerie Coll, Dawn Iannaco-Hahn, and Brenda Wolff. (Answers from the At-Large, District 1, and District 3 candidates may be found here, here, and here.)  For those seeking more context, I suggest checking out the links provided in the Questionnaire itself.

NOTE:  In the July 19 primary election, the top two vote-getters move on to the general election in November. Voters may vote in all the contests, regardless of where in the County they live.

David S. Fishback, Co-Chair for Maryland Advocacy
Metro DC Chapter of PFLAG

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

For many years, the Metro DC Chapter of PFLAG has worked cooperatively with MCPS and the Board of Education to work foster a positive environment for Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender, and Gender Non-Conforming students.

 

In order to inform our members and supporters of the viewpoints of the candidates running to serve on the Board of Education, we respectfully request that you answer the five brief questions pasted below.  In order to provide a context, we include background materials.  As a 501(c)(3) organization, we will not be endorsing candidates for office, but we will pass along your answers, and anything else you would like to let us know, to our members and supporters.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

 

Thank you,

 

David S. Fishback, Maryland Advocacy Co-Chair

Metro DC PFLAG

 

cc:  Mark Eckstein, Maryland Advocacy Co-Chair, Metro DC PFLAG

  

 

1.  HEALTH EDUCATION CURRICULUM

 

Background

 

The secondary school Family Life and Human Sexuality curriculum provides that with respect to matters of sexual orientation and gender identity, the lessons are not “scripted” (as they were prior to 2014), but rather that “instructional planning resources [are] developed similar to all other content areas, including sample learning tasks, suggested instructional resources, and teacher guidance (e.g., the American Psychological Association’s Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation & Homosexuality, available at http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.pdf.  This shift permits teachers to plan instruction based on the specific needs of their students, as they do in all other content areas.” See  https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/c4cf1644198dfd9986257503000d636f/4e99ac91837305c887257cd1006d30ed/$FILE/6%201%20Sec%20Health%20Ed%20Curr%20Framework.pdf (pp. 5-6), adopted by the Board of Education on June 17, 2014.

 

Question

 

What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

 

 

 2.  ANTI-DISCRIMINATION

 

Background

 

MCPS guidelines and regulations make it very clear that the Board of Education “expects all students and staff to conduct themselves in a manner that demonstrates mutual respect without regard to an individual’s actual or perceived personal characteristics, such as . . . gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, [and] family/parental status.” See, for example, A Student’s Guide to Rights and Responsibilities, 2021-22  and Employee Code of Conduct, 2021-22. 

 

With respect to gender identity and expression, MCPS provides specific Guidelines.  See Guidelines Regarding Student Gender Identity, 2021-22

 

Question

  

What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?

 

 

 3.   SUPPORT FOR LGBTQ STUDENTS

 

Background

 

On February 4, 2020, the Board of Education’s Committee on Special Populations reviewed its Support for LGBTQ Students Update.  This review included discussion of MCPS initiatives for support of LGBTQ Students.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/c4cf1644198dfd9986257503000d636f/2687cea280a07e5985258504005b4a33/$FILE/200204%20LGBTQ%20Students%20Update.pdf

 

Question

 

What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?

 

 4.   SCHOOL NAMING

 

Background

 

In 2018, the Board of Education decided to name the new Richard Montgomery Cluster Elementary School after Bayard Rustin, a gay African American civil rights activist who was instrumental to organizing the 1963 March of Washington, which became the platform for Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.  https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/publicinfo/Bayard-Rustin.aspx

 

Question

 

What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?

 

 5.   ATTEMPTS TO BAR DISCUSSION OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR GENDER EXPRESSION.

 

Background

 

In some parts of the country, efforts are being made to prohibit public schools from discussing or even mentioning sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.  See, for example, https://www.npr.org/2022/02/09/1079541236/florida-dont-say-gay-bill and https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/02/09/pete-buttigieg-florida-dont-say-gay-bill-lgbtq-youth-impact-nr-vpx.cnn

 

Question

 

What is your view of these efforts?

 

 6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO.


CANDIDATE RESPONSES:


Valerie M. Coll

1.  What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

I believe that age appropriate information should be shared with students in thoughtfully planned, not scripted, instruction.  Resources that are well-researched and peer reviewed should be made available to educators along with professional development for educators that helps them prepare for the work with students on this topic.


2.  What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?
I support the advocacy and language in current Board policy.  I appreciate the emphasis on ensuring respect for each individual's gender identification, gender expression, sexual orientation and family/parental status.  I would like the board to make sure that there are, within the codes of conduct for students and staff, clear methods for reporting incidents where persons who have been in violation of the policy are held accountable for their words and/or actions. 

3.  What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?
I am in full agreement with the initiatives as outlined.  Because of the pandemic, I would advocate that the Board direct the  district to revisit the document and identify which parts of the initiative have begun, what is still in progress and what needs to still be addressed.  A new timeline for materials and opportunities for training and community discussion should be created to address any parts of the MCPS that remain incomplete.  I also believe that there needs to be on-going opportunities for all staff including educators as well including ES/MS/HS PTSAs  to work with MCPS so that these opportunities are not considered to be a "one and done" checkbox off of the MCPS "to do" list. 

4.  What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?
i am in support of the naming procedure for MCPS schools. School naming is the public face of those people we want our students to know about, understand their importance and seek to apply the lessons learned from the experience of those we choose to honor. Representation matters.

5. What is your view of [“Don’t Say Gay”] efforts?
When a district chooses to limit the world we live in, a district chooses to make education less valuable. Our world is rich and diverse. Students see each other and they see the world as it is; choosing to make that view somehow smaller, more narrow, will close off some students to understanding and to others, it will be seen as the door closing on them or people that they know and love.  

 6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO.

I would very much like the BOE to make sure in more strongly worded language and action that any work done to assist and strengthen our LGBTQ+ students is also explicitly reflected for all MCPS LGBTQ+ staff. 


Dawn Iannaco-Hahn

1.  What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?

I think this is fine, as long as the mainstream information that is included is accurate and unbiased, and presents the whole picture.As long as information is evidence based, it shouldn’t matter if it’s “mainstream” or not. The information presented needs to be constantly reviewed and changed as science changes. 

2.  What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?

I believe all people should be and deserve to be respected and accepted.As with any policy in MCPS, the policy is only as good as it is enforced, and procedures followed. MCPS has a history of sweeping things under the rug in order to preserve their perceived reputation, and this goes for how they handle discrimination within our school communities.

 3.  What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?

I think the initiatives announced in Feb 2020 sound great on paper, but I would want to be sure that MCPS actually follows through with everything contained in the initiative. I would assume, being that everything shut down in March 2020 including school buildings being closed for over a year, that much of what was contained in the initiative has not been done. I also think there needs to be a much greater focus on student voices, at all school levels including elementary school. 

 4.  What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?

I think it was an excellent choice. It’s a beautiful building and deserved to be named after someone like Mr. Rustin who helped to affect positive change in the United States.

 5.  What is your view of ["Don't Say Gay"] efforts?

I think it is ridiculous, and quite frankly dangerous. There is a higher rate of suicide and depression amongst people who struggle with gender identity issues and sexual orientation. By attempting to prohibit discussion, or even the mention of these things, essentially sends the message that those people don’t matter and are in some way “bad” which is why it shouldn’t be talked about, and that is not only unacceptable, it is dangerous.

6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO.

As a mental health therapist for over 20 years, I have worked with many students and families in the LGBTQ community.


Brenda Wolff

1.  What is your position on the inclusion of information from mainstream American medical and mental health professional associations in the MCPS health education curriculum?


I am proud to live in a community where the majority value respect and teach respect for differences. This curriculum process included input from all stakeholders.  I support the concept that instruction should not be scripted. The goal of any curriculum is among other things to teach critical thinking. I like that this curriculum is aligned with the strategic planning framework and promotes a focus on instruction that values diversity and differences. I think it is important to note that parents must opt out of sexual orientation instruction if they don’t wish their kids to participate and yet year after year we see and that a high percentage of parents chose to allow participation.  This speaks well for our community although we know that there is still work to be done.  As a member of the board of education, I will continue to monitor implementation and make any necessary adjustments to ensure the best educational outcome for all students.

2.  What is your view of MCPS anti-discrimination policies with respect to LGBTQ students and employees?

The anti-discrimination policies are comprehensive and consistent with MCPS’ core values.The policies are designed to ensure that students and employees are treated consistently and fairly by providing clear standards of conduct that everyone has to follow, as well as procedures for handling complaints and conducting investigations. At a time when many protections against discrimination are being scaled back, I support the efforts of MCPS to make clear what will and will not be tolerated.

3.  What is your view of the initiatives announced in February 2020?


I fully support the initiatives that were discussed in February 2020. We have been intentional in supporting and celebrating our LGBTQ+ students.


We have implemented a LGBTQ+ Studies course in our high schools. We have Gender Identity Guidelines that protect and support our students dealing with issues surrounding gender identity. That includes transitioning students, non-binary students, and it covers everything from being able to use your preferred name and pronouns to use of bathrooms and locker rooms. Our health curriculum explicitly addresses issues relevant to our LGBTQ+ students.


LGBTQ+ issues are included in our equity training. It is important to note that we both support and celebrate our LGBTQ+ students, they are a part of the beautiful diversity that is foundational to our strength


 4.  What is your view of the naming of Bayard Rustin Elementary School?


I attended the Board meeting that voted to approve the name Bayard Rustin for the new elementary school.  As a civil rights attorney and advocate for inclusiveness, I was proud of this decision.  It was an important statement to the LGBTQ community that you matter, that you are seen and that you are welcome in our schools.  Students need to see themselves reflected in their schools and their teachers.


 5.  What is your view of ["Don't Say Gay"] efforts?


I am appalled by the discourse occurring around the county and supported by some people here in Montgomery County.  MCPS went through this years ago.  I am committed to maintaining an inclusive school culture for all students and will strongly object to attempts to do otherwise by a small minority of people in this community.


6.  IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US, PLEASE DO SO.


My entire career has dealt with issues of equal opportunity and access. I started my career with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission adjudicating appeals from decisions of federal agencies on allegations of discrimination.

I spent 27 years in the US Department of Education in numerous positions.  I served as the Chief Regional Attorney in the Boston Office for Civil Rights and the Deputy Director and Acting Director in the Philadelphia Office for Civil Rights which has jurisdiction over the state of Maryland. 

I was appointed by the Secretary of Education as the Special Assistant for Gender Equity for the entire agency.  In that capacity I advised the Secretary and Deputy Secretary on issues of gender equity in all of the Department’s programs.  During that time I also took on the role of advancing the President’s One America Initiative on Race.   I facilitated discussions and activities in the Department that allowed staff to feel safe in talking about race relations in their offices and lives. 

I later became the Director of the National Institute of Educational Governance, Finance Policymaking and Management in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement of the US Department of Education becoming responsible for managing studies on numerous school governance and policy issues concerned with improving the quality of education and ensuring access to equal education opportunities for all. During that time I also served as the Acting Director of the National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students.

 I subsequently moved to the National Center for Education Statistics serving as the Program Manager for the National Assessment of Education Progress.  In this position I was responsible for management of a budget in excess 0f $131 million dollars a year, Reporting and Quality Assurance. 

I am sharing this history so that you understand how committed how I am to ensuring that all children are treated with dignity and respect and provided equitable access and opportunity to all programs and activities in MCPS.  This has been the work I have been involved in and continue to do as part of the current Board of Education.