My Final Endorsements for Montgomery County MD Board of Education and other contests on the MoCo ballot
In election years, many of my friends and acquaintances, knowing my involvement in local elective politics, particularly regarding the Board of Education, ask my opinion as to who would be the best choices.[1]
For the reasons that follow, I am endorsing Natalie Zimmerman for the District 2 seat, Laura Stewart for the District 4 seat, and Rita Montoya for the At-Large seat, as I did in the primary election last spring, and for the same reasons I noted then.
My other recommendations for other contests and ballot questions follow the BOE discussion.
BACKGROUND: In 1996, in the aftermath of Bill Clinton’s reelection as president, right-wing anti-LGBTQ+ political operative Ralph Reed said, “I would rather have a thousand school board members than one president and no school board members." The right-wing has targeted Montgomery County in the past, without success.
We are a progressive community when it comes to LGBTQ+ matters, including caring for and embracing all of our students. In last May’s primary election, three of the seven seats were before the voters. The three incumbents, all of whom were standing for reelection, have been strong supporters of these progressive policies. But because of administrative problems in MCPS having nothing to do with pro-LGBTQ+ policies, those incumbents were challenged by candidates who shared those policies, but believed that new BOE board members would provide more effective oversight of other aspects of MCPS administration. The teachers’ union, MCEA, endorsed those challengers, while the union representing MCPS support staff (SEIU Local 500) endorsed the incumbents. Last spring, I endorsed the MCEA-endorsed challengers for the reasons I set forth in an April 2024 blogpost. IMPORTANT REMINDER: While the District candidates must live in those districts, everyone in the County may vote in all three contests.)
HERE ARE MY CHOICES FOR THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
District 2: Natalie Zimmerman. This is the most important race, because the incumbent hardly campaigned and, as a result, did not make the run-off. After participating in a Zoom meeting with Ms. Zimmerman, I am even more confident that she would be a very important, useful addition to the BOE, bringing the vital perspectives of an experienced elementary school teacher.
The candidate who came in second to Ms. Zimmerman in the primary was Brenda Diaz. Ms. Diaz is a far-right candidate who advocates for policies on vaccines endorsed by RFK, Jr., who she cited as the source of her views during a podcast interview last spring. Her views on LGBTQ+ matters are out of the mainstream in Montgomery County, and she is being actively supported by the local Republican Party which is all-in for Donald Trump and other right-wing candidates. For details on these serious concerns, including the audio of her embrace of RFK, Jr.'s views on vaccines published last spring on the I Hate Politics Podcast, see this blogpost. Also, the largest contributor to her campaign is the Campaign Committee of Bethany Mandel, who ran unsuccessfully in the primary for the District 4 seat. See public document here. (To find it, just type “Diaz, Brenda M. Friends for” in the top right-hand box, click search, and go to the 8/27/2024 Campaign Statement). For convenience, below is a screen shot of the pertinent page.
Ms. Mandel, who came in a distant third out of three candidates for the District 4 seat in the primary, is a very extreme figure. Here is what I reportedDistrict 4 candidate Bethany Mandel . . . declined to respond the Metro DC PFLAG questionnaire, which typically is a sure sign that she is not supportive of LGBTQ+ students. In campaign forums, Ms. Mandel has vigorously expressed her opposition to the MCPS storybook policy regarding opt-out, and goes further, attacking what she refers to as "woke" approaches to education. She has six children, and home-schools those who are school age; she has no experience with MCPS. In one forum, she said that she wants MCPS to follow her advice about education because her children will someday have to deal with children who have graduated from MCPS. Ms. Mandel, who has the support of the right-wing Moms for Liberty was active in the 2023 Moms for Liberty rally in Philadelphia featuring Donald Trump and Ron De Santis, and is a fairly well-known commentator in right-wing circles, as recently documented here.
District 4: Laura Stewart. I am confident that the best choice for the District 4 seat is Laura Stewart. This is not because I have any specific criticism of Ms. Evans (who has done good work as a BOE member), other than being part of a BOE that has been unable to provide the administrative oversight that might well have avoided things like the Beidleman Scandal. But we do need a fresh start, and Ms. Stewart provides an energy that would be very helpful to the Board, and make it more effective. Ms. Stewart's years of MCPS and PTSA advocacy, both at the local and state levels, have shown energy, wisdom, and commitment, which led to her endorsement by the MCEA and a range of other groups. I have been particularly impressed with her dogged, public advocacy in support of sound BOE/MCPS policies that have been under attack from outside right-wing advocacy groups. Along with former BOE member Jill Ortman-Fouse, Ms. Stewart spearheaded the effort to mobilize people to back MCPS when it was under attack, and, to be frank, MCPS was not doing a very good job explaining the wisdom of its policy. The letter signed by more than 3,000 residents of Montgomery County helped to turn the tide of public opinion when demonstrations in front of MCPS headquarters threatened to monopolize the conversation. Similarly, her participation in drafting and signing the above-referenced Guest Commentary in Maryland Matters ("We can't opt out of diversity in our schools and communities") helped advance the discussion, and dispelled, I believe, some of the misconceptions that were creeping into local media. Again, we would be well-served by either candidate, but I strongly believe that a well-qualified non-incumbent would be the better choice going forward.
At-Large: Rita Montoya. Like District 4 incumbent Shebra Evans, At-Large incumbent Lynne Harris is very well-qualified and supports policies I support. But fresh infusion of new people would be useful. On balance, I believe that Ms. Montoya would be the better choice. She has useful personal and professional experiences as a PTA president, parent of elementary school children, juvenile public defender, and work with underserved communities, and thus could add useful perspectives to the BOE.
OTHER MATTERS ON THE BALLOT:
No one who knows me will be surprised by my other endorsements, but here they are:
President & Vice President: Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
Senator: Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks. Election of her opponent, former Governor Larry Hogan, would most certainly give control of the Senate to Donald Trump’s minions in the Senate and allow them to make it virtually impossible for a President Harris to effectively govern. This is enough to counsel in favor of voting for County Executive Alsobrooks.
Four sitting Montgomery County Circuit judges won both the Democratic and Republican primaries, so they are running unopposed in the general election. And three state appellate judges face the voters regarding their continuation in office. The Montgomery County Democratic endorses all the judges.
Question 1 is a proposed amendment to the Maryland Constitution which would enshrine reproductive freedom. State statutory law currently does so, but this would make the protections even stronger, an important thing in light of the current membership of the U.S. Supreme Court. Please vote YES (FOR) on Question 1.
Question A is an attempt by the Republican Party of Montgomery County to amend the County Charter to bar a County Executive from election to more than two consecutive terms in office. (Currently the limit is three consecutive terms.) This is a blatant attempt to subvert the will of the voters. See here. Please vote NO (AGAINST) on Question A.
[1] This is where I am coming from on MCPS issues: I have been involved in MCPS matters since 1984, when I was co-president of the Rosemary Hills Primary School PTA, working for needed resources for this magnet integration school. Later, I was public affairs director for the Gifted and Talented Association of Montgomery County, working to secure appropriate education for students and seeking ways to widen the net with respect to GT identification and opportunities; I subsequently, as a PTSA Board member at Richard Montgomery High School, worked to protect needed resources for the Blair, Richard Montgomery, Takoma Park, and Eastern signature secondary schools. Beginning in 2002, after my children graduated from MCPS, I became active in working to secure appropriate health education and other MCPS policies regarding LGBT+ issues, and continue in this area (in which MCPS has made great progress) to this day.
No comments:
Post a Comment