Wednesday, September 24, 2025

The Gates of Gaza by Amir Tibon


I just finished reading The Gates of Gaza: A Story of Betrayal, Survival and Hope in Israel's Borderlands by Amir Tibon.  Tibon is a writer for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, who lived with his wife Miri and two young children in Kibbutz Nahal Oz, which was attacked by Hamas on October 7, 2023.  He chronicles the horror of the attack and the bravery in response.  These chronicles are interspersed with descriptions of what led up to October 7, including the conduct of Benyamin Netanyahu and his allies, which, in Tibon's informed telling of the history, contributed so much to the tragedy.  The book also provides insights into the larger dilemmas that those living in the region face, reaching back to the creation of Israel in 1948.


************************

The title of the book comes from the title of the 1956 eulogy presented by Moishe Dayan at the funeral of Roi Rutberg, the security chief of Kibbutz Nahal Oz, who was ambushed by Palestinians who had crossed the border:

"Early yesterday morning, Roi was murdered. The quiet of the spring morning dazzled him, and he did not see those waiting in ambush at the edge of the furrow. . . .  Let us not cast the blame on the murderers. Why should we question their burning hatred for us? For eight years, they have been sitting in the refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes, we have been transforming the lands and the villages, where they and their fathers dwelt, into our estate."

Dayan did not use this rare recognition from a high-ranking Israeli government official of the price paid by the Palestinians in 1948 (and thereafter) as a plea to find a way to peace.  Rather, Dayan concluded that the "young Roi who left Tel Aviv to build his home at the gates of Gaza, to be a wall for us, was blinded by the light in his heart and he did not see the flash of the sword.  The yearning for peace deafened his ears and he did not hear the voice of murder waiting in ambush.  The gates of Gaza weighed too heavily on his shoulders, and overcame him." pp. 27-28.

Tibon goes on to report that in "Nahal Oz, not everyone liked the speech.  Some of the young kibbutzniks found it too dark.  They wanted to believe that one day, maybe in the distant future, there would be peace between their community and the communities in Gaza." (p. 28)

************************

At the end of the book, Tibon relates his visit, some months after October 7, to the Nahal Oz's cemetery.  He says that as "an Israeli citizen, I supported the war effort, at least in the early months of the fighting.  I was angry over what Hamas had done and scared of how Israeli weakness in the face of that attack would be perceived by our other adversaries in the region.  But as a human being, I find it extremely difficult to countenance the level of destruction caused by my own country inside Gaza.  And as a resident of Nahal Oz who still holds out hope that my family will one day be able to return here, I have to ask myself what will result from all this violence -- peace and quiet or more violence?" (p. 288-289)

Tibon concludes by hearkening back to Dayan's 1956 eulogy for Roi Rutberg -- and the reaction to it (both then and now) from so many people of Nahal Oz:

"They had come to build their homes on the border knowing that war might interrupt their lives at any moment -- but they had never seen conflict as an inevitability.  They wanted to believe that one day, there could be peace with the people on the other side.  Some of them still believe it, even after everything that happened on October 7 and its aftermath.

"Gaza's gates still weigh on our country, as heavily as if Dayan had delivered his speech only yesterday.  But as I walk out of the cemetery, I realize that there's more to the story.  These gates don't just weigh on our shoulders, as Dayan said back then; in the years and decades to come, they will weigh even more heavily on our souls." (p. 290)

************************

I could end this blogpost now, but I want to note that I found particularly striking two very personal passages from Tibon.  

The first describes the November 2021 rise of the Netanyahu/Ben-Gvir-Smotrich coalition:

"Netanyahu and his Far Right, ultrareligious partners returned to power with a stable majority.  For the first time since his criminal trial began three years earlier, he had decisively won an election.

"On election night, Netanyahu announced that he intended to lead a 'fully right-wing coalition,' consisting of Likud, two ultrareligious parties, and a new party led by Ben-Gvir, which had won fourteen seats -- an all-time high for the Israeli Far Right.  This unprecedented result was an even greater shock than Netanyahu's return to power.

"The next morning, for the first time since we'd moved to Nahal Oz, Miri and I spoke about the possibility of leaving -- the kibbutz, and perhaps even the country -- for good. We were scared of what this new, extremist government would bring and the kind of future that our daughters would have in a country where a man like Ben-Gvir could hold power."  (p. 235)

[From afar, three years earlier in 2018, I expressed similar concerns after an earlier Netanyahu coalition enacted the "nation-state" bill, which, I believed, had put Israel on a potentially fatal path.  

[And the fears I had were even greater by early 2023.]

In the second, in late July 2023, Tibon recalls that hours after the Netanyahu Government convinced the Knesset to enact a bill which started the process of dismantling the Israeli judicial system, he met a close friend and neighbor "while we were both walking our dogs in the neighborhood.  He looked devastated. 'We've taken our children onto a ship, and now it's out in the deep ocean, and the captain is drunk,' he told me, in an attempt to explain his feelings. 'I want to get my children off the ship. And I'm scared that it might be too late."  (p. 247)

A little more than three months later, on October 7, Kibbutz Nahal Oz was overrun.  

************************

So where do we go from here?  What is the future?  As we grapple with these unavoidable questions,  reading The Gates of Gaza is essential.  It also might be useful to read the words of the late Leonard Fein, who made up this story after the Six Day War, but before the First Intifada.  And maybe this short 2021 letter to The Washington Jewish Week, as well.


Thursday, August 14, 2025

Haaretz report on the Israeli Government's plans to make a two-state solution impossible.

 

Israel to Okay Plan Splitting West Ba

nk in Two to 'Bury the Idea of a

 

Palestinian State'

Smotrich vows to 'bury the idea of a Palestinian state' with 3,400 homes in E1. 'They'll talk of a Palestinian dream, we'll build a Jewish reality,' he said, as the plan deepens West Bank divisions and draws global criticism. 


https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-08-14/ty-article/.premium/smotrich-calls-for-israeli-sovereignty-in-west-bank-as-govt-advances-controversial-plan/00000198-a7eb-dba8-a3dc-b7fba6ac0000 


This is yet another step from the Israeli Administration admittedly designed to make a two-state solution impossible.  Sealing the fate of Israel by making Jews a minority within its borders, unless unacceptable and unsustainable ethnic cleansing follows. This is the nightmare:  If Israel becomes a minority Jewish country, will it cease to be a democracy for all its inhabitants?  Smotrich plainly would choose permanent oppression or expulsion of non-Jews. If this becomes the final reality in Israel, a state which does to others what has been done to us over the centuries, then Jews in the Diaspora (and in Israel) will be faced with an awful dilemma. Do we support a state which is, in our names as Jews, totally antithetical to our values as Jews?

We should not be surprised. In 2003, Rabbi Michael Melchior, who was a member of the Knesset and chair of the Birthright Steering Committee, warned the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism’s  Consultation on Conscience that we (and still I say “we”) were heading down this path. Here is my report on his presentation from Temple Emanuel’s May 2003 Kol Kore newsletter: 



Tuesday, June 24, 2025

History of LGBTQ+ Progress in the Montgomery County MD Public Schools (MCPS), 2002-2025

In 2015, PFLAG National published on its website a monograph entitled Curriculum Victory in Montgomery County, Maryland: A Case Study and Handbook for Action.  It is now housed on the Metro DC PFLAG website in the Resources and Advocacy Work sections.  The Curriculum Victory monograph has now been amended to include information through June 24, 2025 and may be found directly here and here.

As noted at the end of the amended monograph, at this writing, we are awaiting a decision from the United States Supreme Court challenging one of MCPS’s recent initiatives to foster respect for and understanding of LGBTQ+ people and their families. PFLAG responses to the decision will be handled by PFLAG National. 

The amended monograph is provided as a resource to foster awareness of the background to help in moving forward, whatever the Supreme Court decides. 


Wednesday, June 18, 2025

The Supreme Court's terrible 6-3 decision in United States v. Skrmetti

We need to work toward a society in which people are not so afraid, or ignorant, of differences that they will countenance cruelty to families and children.

Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. SkrmettiThe 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts permits the State of Tennessee to ban the use of medical treatments for transgender adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria.  This decision essentially tells families of transgender minors (and their physicians) that they must either (1) condemn their children to dangers that have all-to-often led to extreme distress and even suicide or (2) choose exile to states that do not have such laws.  And it opens the possibility that if the Republican MAGA majority in the House continues and if the Republican MAGA majority in the Senate dispenses with the filibuster, then such laws could be enacted by the Congress and signed by the President, meaning that such families would have to leave their homes in the United States altogether in order to do right by their children.

This is cruel and unacceptable, as Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justices Jackson and Kagan) explained in her dissent:

Transgender adolescents’ access to hormones and pu-

berty blockers (known as gender-affirming care) is not a

matter of mere cosmetic preference. To the contrary, access

to care can be a question of life or death. Some transgender

adolescents suffer from gender dysphoria, a medical condi-

tion characterized by clinically significant and persistent

distress resulting from incongruence between a person’s

gender identity and sex identified at birth. App. to Pet. for

Cert. 251a–252a. If left untreated, gender dysphoria can

lead to severe anxiety, depression, eating disorders, sub-

stance abuse, self-harm, and suicidality. See, e.g., Cole-

man, 23 Int’l J. Transgender Health, at S62. Suicide, in

particular, is a major concern for parents of transgender

teenagers, as the lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts

among transgender individuals may be as high as 40%.

App. to Pet. for Cert. 264a. Tragically, studies suggest that

as many as one-third of transgender high school students

attempt suicide in any given year.


When provided in appropriate cases, gender-affirming

medical care can meaningfully improve the health and well-

being of transgender adolescents, reducing anxiety, depres-

sion, suicidal ideation, and (for some patients) the need for

more invasive surgical treatments later in life.4 That is why

the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical As-

sociation, American Psychiatric Association, American Psy-

chological Association, and American Academy of Child Ad-

olescent Psychiatry all agree that hormones and puberty

blockers are “appropriate and medically necessary” to treat

gender dysphoria when clinically indicated. Id., at 285a.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf (pp. 88-89 of the PDF, pp. 4-5 of Justice Sotomayor's dissent)

Justice Sotomayor also criticizes the linguistic gymnastics used by the majority to reach its right-wing ideological result.  But I will leave that to others to discuss.

It is important for the general public to understand how cruel such statutes are.  May the one-third of the electorate which has chosen to opt out of voting altogether understand this cruelty and join the other one-third who oppose the MAGA agenda to elect representatives who will reject this cruelty.   Parents should not have to choose exile to protect their children.  We need to work toward a society in which people are not so afraid, or ignorant, of differences that they will countenance cruelty to families and children.

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

“Say Their Names” and “Thinking about the Unthinkable”

 “Say Their Names” and “Thinking about the Unthinkable”

 

1.  The murders of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky

 

Extremists on all sides target the innocents. And in so doing seek to set in motion more extremism.  The 1995 assassination of Rabin by a right-wing Israeli set in motion the events which led to the Second Intifada, which led to more extremism among both Israelis and Palestinians. The barbarous Hamas attack on October 7 set in motion the Israeli killing of thousands of Palestinian children in Gaza and more attacks by settlers on the West Bank. Our challenge is how to stop this downward spiral. 

 

Unlike in earlier eras, now there are people, in our name, doing unspeakable things on a mass level. We - and still I say we - never before had such power. As Albert Einstein (a Zionist himself) noted in 1936, “I believe that the unique durability of the Jewish community is to a large degree based on our geographical dispersion, and the fact that we consequently do not possess instruments of power that will allow us to commit great stupidities out of national fanaticism.”  Now “we” have such power, and are abusing it, as Einstein feared.  

 

Of course, none of this justifies the murders of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky.  We should say their names.  But no one is able to similarly say the names of the thousands of children killed in Gaza.  As Stalin is reputed to have said, “One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.”  But if we are to adhere to the admonition in our tradition that “whoever destroys a single life is considered to have destroyed a world”, we must grapple with the implications of the destruction of thousands of worlds.  We must not fall into the trap of the Stalins of this planet. 

 

 

2.  Thinking about the unthinkable

 

On May 12, 2025, Rabbi Rick Jacobs, President of the Union for Reform Judaism, the largest denomination of Judaism in North America, published an op-ed in the Washington Post entitled I'm a rabbi. Starving Gaza is immoral: A just war must be fought by just means.  Here is his bottom line:

 

"I have said on numerous occasions since Oct. 8, I cannot be silent in the face of the immense suffering of civilians in Gaza, including hundreds of thousands of children. Hamas is willing to sacrifice thousands of Palestinians by hoarding humanitarian aid; Israel must not. Depriving Gazans of food and water will not make Israel safer or hasten the return of the hostages. Each of us who loves Israel must say so — and urge Israel to change this policy."

 

After reading it, I immediately thought about the agonizing question of what we do if the Israeli government does not change this morally suicidal course.  

 

Shortly after publication, Rabbi Jacobs did a fine job on MSNBC discussing his op-ed. I was thrilled that he was getting air-time before thousands, hopefully millions, of people to explain how this major leader of the Reform Jewish Movement is approaching the crises. The more we are able to do this, the better off we will be.

 

Professor Eddie Glaude, the other guest on the segment, praised Rabbi Jacobs’ wisdom and courage. At 4:44, Professor Glaude then "ask[ed] a basic question. How many dead Palestinians are needed for the State of Israel? What level of mass death is required to satiate your revenge, to feel safe? How many dead babies and children? We have to ask that moral question as we bear witness to what we are seeing."

 

The segment then went on to a different topic.  But Professor Glaude asked the uncomfortable question that came into my mind earlier in the day.  An uncomfortable question, but every question involving the current crises is uncomfortable.

 

I believe that for most of us in the Reform Movement, the question of revenge is not part of the calculus. But the question of how "to feel safe" is. Or, to put it another way, how we weigh our sense of safety alongside our sense of morality. As I thought about this I noticed the picture of James Baldwin in Professor Glaude’s office and remembered Baldwin’s famous statement: "Not everything that is faced can be fixed. But nothing can be fixed if it is not faced."

 

The apparent green light that the Trump Administration has given the Netanyahu/Ben-Gvir/Smotrich Administration to lay waste to Gaza makes it even more imperative that we face Professor Glaude’s question.

 

P.S.  After writing the last paragraph, I saw the NY Times news analysis from Patrick Kinsley.  So now even Trump thinks (or says he thinks) the Netanyahu/Ben-Gvi/Smotrich Administration has become too brutal.  When even Trump says that Israel’s government is going too far, we surely need to be unambiguous in our condemnation of its tactics and strategy.  Israel needs to reconsider its approach – and not just in a way to put a fig-leaf over what the Netanyahu/Ben-Gvir/Smotrich has made clear is their intent.


P.P.S.  And then this on May 28:

Thomas Friedman's piece on Israel and the United States is an absolute must-read for anyone concerned about the survival of both nations. It is long. Maybe best read aloud. But it is essential. We must face the present crises squarely, and not simply hope that the dangers will pass.
And this in Haaretz from former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Omert, concluding that the Netanyahu/Ben-Gvir/Smotrich regime is committing “war crimes.”  It is painful to read, but we cannot bury our heads in the sand.

************************************************************************

 

Related blogposts:


https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2025/05/on-matt-bais-column-graduates-speak.html


https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2025/03/thoughts-on-watching-todays-senate.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2024/05/congressman-nadler-is-right-about.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2023/12/chanukah-2023.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2023/01/dont-let-light-go-out-chanukah-in-time.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2022/12/dont-let-light-go-out-is-it-becoming.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2020/07/thoughts-on-peter-beinarts-new.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2018/07/has-dream-died-in-israel-dont-let-light.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2020/07/thoughts-on-peter-beinarts-new.html

 

https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2015/07/bringing-together-israelis-and.html

Monday, May 26, 2025

On Matt Bai's column, Graduates speak their minds. Universities freak out. In punishing students who make pro-Palestinian commencement speeches, schools lose their way.

 Matt Bai got this right. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/05/22/higher-education-gaza-universities-graduation/  If you are blocked by the Post paywall, his column may be read here.  As GW's 1969 commencement speaker, my wife and I wrote to the university's president last week making the same point:

 

Dear President Granberg:

 

As alumni of The George Washington University (David - BA ’69; Barbara - BA ’71 and MS in Forensic Science ‘75), we are writing to express our disappointment in the statement issued by the University’s Office of Communications and Marketing, apologizing for Cecilia Culver’s student commencement speech and banning her from all GW campuses and events. See https://mediarelations.gwu.edu/statement-ccas-school-ceremony-disruption and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE6wK3gB9XM

 

Both of us have been and continue to be active members of our Jewish community: Barbara is a past president of our synagogue’s sisterhood, and both of us have served on our synagogue’s board of trustees.  David is an active member of Jews United for Justice and a recipient of JUFJ’s Heschel Vision Award. https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2015/12/heschel-vision-award-jews-united-for.html  And David is a member of the Commission on Social Action of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.  (This letter is written solely in our personal capacities.)

 

In 1969, David was selected to be student speaker at the GW graduation ceremony. https://davidfishback.blogspot.com/2015/12/student-commencement-speeches-1969.html

Like Ms. Culver, he was given this opportunity because he was respected by University officials. https://economics.columbian.gwu.edu/gw-economics-statistics-double-major-receives-ccas-distinguished-scholar-award

 

1969 was as fraught a period as the present day.  David does not recall whether his speech was pre-cleared or not, but the speech included harsh condemnations of the War in Vietnam and American racism.  Specifically, he does vividly recall an incident in the days before the ceremony, when some students, protesting the Vietnam War, had a “grovel-in” in a University office.  The protest so offended University officials that they threatened to bar one of the protesters from graduating.  David quietly let it be known that, if the protester were barred from graduating, he would refuse to be the commencement speaker.  Cooler heads prevailed, and the protester graduated.

 

With respect to Ms. Culver, the University’s statement makes much of the assertion that Ms. Culver presented a text of her speech for University approval, but then, instead, proceeded to present the discussion of the tragedy in Gaza.  We think this misses the point entirely.  We looked at the University’s discussions of the Columbian College decision to select Ms. Culver and saw that the University was continuing the tradition of selecting an outstanding scholar and member of the community to be commencement speaker.  See https://economics.columbian.gwu.edu/gw-economics-statistics-double-major-receives-ccas-distinguished-scholar-award Having made that selection, it was insulting that the University then felt it needed to “vet” her speech.  We are not at all surprised that Ms. Culver determined that showing the speech she intended to give was not a good idea, when, in the past year and a half, the University had shown so much hostility to those who disagreed with the nature and extent of Israel’s military response to Hamas’ barbarism of October 7, 2023. 

 

We, in great sadness, have come to the conclusion that the choices made by the Israeli government have played into the hands of Hamas.  While Ms. Culver’s speech was not the speech we would have given, it was within the realm of legitimate discourse in this time of crisis. Whether the killing of tens of thousands of people in the Gaza War comes within the legal definition of “genocide” is not ultimately the point; the amount of death is there for all to see.   Indeed, the University official who presided over the ceremony, Associate Dean Kavita Daiya, motioned Ms. Culver back to the podium at the conclusion of the speech and said the following: “Thank you, Cecilia. Here at Columbian College, we represent a variety of views, and we thank you for sharing your words and views.”   https://economics.columbian.gwu.edu/gw-economics-statistics-double-major-receives-ccas-distinguished-scholar-award at 3:08.

And that is where it should have ended.

 

Great universities in open societies do not shrink from discourse on difficult, contentious issues. Dean Daiya provided the opportunity for GW to show itself to be a great university.  But the actions described in the Office of Communications and Marketing’s statement squandered that opportunity.  We are saddened that our alma mater has chosen mediocrity over greatness.

 

In the hope that you can do better in the future,

 

Barbara and David Fishback

Friday, April 18, 2025

"Finding Fellowship" -- Now More Than Ever

 

https://www.pbs.org/video/finding-fellowship-3bz18O/