Friday, March 13, 2020

Washington Jewish Week interview

This was published on-line by the Washington Jewish Week on Feb. 28, and was in the print edition on April 2.  The cover story on April 2 was on Mike Tabor, whose commitment dwarfs mine.  https://washingtonjewishweek.com/65484/farmer-and-activist-mike-tabor-is-still-pushing-himself-and-the-causes-he-believes-in/featured-slider-post/

Anyway, here is the published report of the interview of me, followed by my comments on the interview.  As noted below, I had hoped that it would focus less on me and much more on the American Jewish Community's commitment to social justice.



Social justice is in David Fishback’s DNA



David Fishback. Photo by Selmo Khenissi

By Selma Khenissi
David Fishback has a dream. Everywhere he goes, he carries with him a vision of an America where everyone feels safe.
“Only when everyone is safe in America, can Jews be safe in America,” says Fishback, 72, an Olney resident and member of Temple Emanuel in Kensington. For years, he has organized the Reform congregation’s Martin Luther King Jr. Shabbat Service. His steadfastness to the civil rights leader’s legacy has much to do with the time and place of Fishback’s birth.
“I was born in 1947, and my I was raised in an atmosphere in which social justice was the most important part of my identity as a Jew,” he says. “I was acutely aware of being so fortunate to be born a Jew in the United States after the Holocaust, and that good fortune made it an imperative for me to pay back the United States by doing whatever I could to erase our American stains from slavery and its legacy.  For me, they are all of a piece.”
A retired lawyer and a grandfather, Fishback grew up in Silver Spring. His own grandfather took a ship from Bremen, Germany, and arrived at Ellis Island in September 1911.
Fishback says his origin story is common among many American Jews. What is less common is what he has done with his legacy as the grandchild of immigrants.
“That is why I did anti-poverty work while in college and then served as a VISTA Volunteer in Memphis,” he says. “And why, once I became a parent, I worked against racial isolation in Montgomery County Public Schools. And why I became a member of the county’s Martin Luther King Commemorative Committee.”
Organizing Temple Emanuel’s King service “has been a way to advance the vision of Dr. King and Dr. Heschel,” he says, referring to Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a civil rights activist and colleague of King’s. “These issues go to my core identity as a Jew and as a human being.”
Despite its imperfections, America is home to Fishback. To live anywhere else, he says, would make him feel like he is “in exile.”
Social justice work in much of the Jewish community now goes under the name tikkun olam, or repairing the world. Another aspect of Judaism that Fishback treasures is the Passover seder, with its theme of freeing the enslaved from the shackles of injustice.
Fishback says he is partial to the Freedom Seder Haggadah that Rabbi Arthur Waskow, director of the Shalom Center, introduced in Washington in 1969.
At that First Freedom Seder, to paraphrase the traditional haggadah, anyone who wasn’t Jewish and wanted commemorate the first anniversary of King’s murder was welcome to attend.
As a law student, Fishback adopted this haggadah, with its passages from King, Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau and others. As a parent, he incorporated the haggadah into his family celebration. “It was just perfect,” he says.
Making America a more “perfect Union” involves effort, he says. There will always be “people who harbor prejudices,” which become amplified when leaders “appeal to people’s worst instincts.”
While leaders who do so “can wield great power,” Fishback believes “there are still more of us than there are of them.”
White supremacists and neo-Nazis are damaged people who want to feel a sense of belonging, he says. Undeterred, Fishback continues on, doing his part to create a community where everyone can feel like they belong. “The worst thing to do,” he says, “would be to give up.”
Selma Khenissi is a Washington-area writer.
https://washingtonjewishweek.com/64640/social-justice-is-in-david-fishbacks-dna/featured-slider-post/

*********************************************************************************


This is a positive piece, and to the extent that anyone reads it, I hope it will help spur them to action.

However, I am a bit disappointed that the writer did not stress what I had urged her to stress: The American Jewish culture of which I am a part, and that my perspective is the same that infuses so much of our community.  She writes, "Fishback says his origin story is common among may American Jews.  What is less common is what he has done with his legacy as the grandchild of immigrants."  In the interview, I pushed the point that I am not unusual, noting the politics and activism of so many American Jews, including, locally, Jews United for Justice.  I am part of that culture, not an anomaly.  I had hoped that the piece would use me as an exemplar of a significant portion of the American Jewish Community.

Here is what I wrote to her before the interview:

Selma,

I am looking forward to our chat today.  I thought it might be useful to pass this along.

David Holzel [the Editor of the Washington Jewish Week, who asked if the WJW could do a profile on me]  asked me “why you continue to organize the [Temple Emanuel] MLK event year after year? What does it mean to you? Why is it important to you?”).

I sent him this answer:  “I was born in 1947, and was raised in an atmosphere in which social justice was the most important part of my identity as a Jew.  I was acutely aware of being so fortunate to be born a Jew in the United States after the Holocaust, and that good fortune made it an imperative for me to pay back the United States by doing whatever I could to erase our American stains from slavery and its legacy.  For me, they are all of a piece.  That is why I did anti-poverty work while in college and then served as a VISTA Volunteer in Memphis.  And why, once I became a parent, I worked against racial isolation in MCPS schools; and why I became a member of the County's MLK Commemorative Committee; and why organizing the MLK service has been important to me as a small contribution in my faith community to advance the vision of Dr. King and Dr. Heschel.  In other words, these issues go to my core identity as a Jew and as a human being.”

A more succinct answer may be found in my remarks when I received a Heschel Vision Award from Jews United for Justice in 2015:  “As a Jew born after the Holocaust, in an America reborn by the New Deal and with the promise of becoming a More Perfect Union through the Civil Rights Movement, I cannot remember I time when I did not have an acute sense of how fortunate I was, and how much I wanted to be part of sustaining what is good in our country, and improving what needs to be improved. I was fortunate to grow up in a family that placed a high value on the concept of Tikkun Olam – our responsibility to repair the world.”
After we set up an interview, I thought it would be useful to organize my thoughts in preparation.  And after I did that, I thought you might find it useful, as well.  Here is what I wrote for myself.  It may make it easier for us to chat, without as much furious notetaking.   

I hope the focus of the interview will be on the Jewish milieu which shaped my commitment to public service.  My own biography is only incidental to that broader question as to why American Jews are so committed to social justice, beyond the immediate interests of the Jewish Community.  My life, in which I chose public service as a career and continually involved myself in volunteer efforts to make the world better, is not unusual.  My own congregation is filled with such people.  There are so many American Jews whose lives and commitment have been far deeper than mine.  The interesting and important question is why this is so. 

I believe that the American Jewish perspective, which is dominant in the American Jewish Community (just look at how a vast majority of American Jews vote and how deeply they are involved in social justice movements) arose out of both the secular and religious immigrant experience. 

Generations of American Jews have simultaneously (1) been grateful that America provided a safe harbor and enormous opportunities to have good lives, and (2) taken seriously the "promise" of the best of America.  The way we pay back for the great opportunities and freedoms we have found here (as opposed to in the "Old Country') is to do what we can to help America become the society promised by the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address.  And while this, for me, has always been out of a sense of altruism inspired by the immigrant experience and, later, by a deeper understanding of the faith tradition, I am also acutely aware that only when everyone is safe in America, can Jews be safe in America.  

From the religious point of view, it is best exemplified by the reasons we retell the Passover story at the Seder: "For once we were slaves in Egypt."  We are reminded of that every year not just as a victory of tribe, but of the revolutionary concepts set forth in the early scriptures of justice for all -- not just Jews, but for "the strangers," as well.  

Indeed, the parallels between words and practices of the Torah and the words and practices of the American Revolution (& its emergence through the Civil War, Reconstruction, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Movement) are striking:  Broad, revolutionary principles of justice and kindness, never completely fulfilled (and often woefully unfulfilled), but with the underlying imperative that it is our duty, and the duty of every generation, to do better on the journey to what Dr. King called "The Beloved Community."  In my generation, Dr. King's words had such resonance in part because they called us, as Jews, to remember our own stories and struggles, and to pay it forward.


Monday, March 2, 2020

History of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum and John Garza

UPDATE, MAY 5, 2020:  It recently came to my attention that John Garza is the principal attorney bringing suit against Gov. Hogan in an attempt to block a recently-enacted law prohibiting licensed health care provisionals from practicing the discredited conversion or reparative therapies on minors. His co-counsel is the right-wing Liberty Counsel, run by Matt Staver.  The federal district court dismissed the claim, which is now on appeal.  See  https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20190802a06 .  Twenty states have such laws, and all efforts to block them in the courts have been rejected, including by at least three federal circuit courts of appeal.

A comprehensive history of the ultimately unsuccessful effort by Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, whose President (and earlier, Vice President) and Legal Counsel was John Garza, to block progress on LGBTQ matters in MCPS, written in 2015, may be found at

https://pflag.org/sites/default/files/Curriculum%20Victory%20in%20Montgomery%20County%202.pdf

This history is also summarized in this MCPS report from May 2014 at pp. 1-2 https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/9JVRVT6D30ED/$file/6%201%20Sec%20Health%20Ed%20Curr%20Framework.pdf 

These links from the decade of the battles in which Mr. Garza was the leader of the ultimately unsuccessful effort to block inclusion of the mainstream American medical and mental health professional association wisdom in the health education curriculum are instructive: 

2005:

March 


May


June 

2007:

February 

March


May
To get a sense of Mr. Garza’s mindset, see the transcript of his May 28, 2007 discussion of the MCPS curriculum on Bruce DuPuyt’s New Talk program.  http://vigilance.teachthefacts.org/2007/05/newstalk-transcript-first-part.html

June

2008:

February



March

2011:

April

2014:

May

In addition, Bethesda Magazine published an instructive article by Eugene Meyer in its Sept./Oc. 2007 edition, discussing Mr. Garza and his organization, Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum.  As far as I can determine, it was never posted on-line, but below are the pages from the print edition, followed by links to a transcript of the News Talk program referenced several times in Mr. Meyer's article (and my comments on the article, sent to some of my Teachthefacts.org friends:

"Minority Retort" from Bethesda Magazine (Sept./Oct. 2007) on the Montgomery County Health Education Controversy









Here are links to the transcript of the New Talk discussion I had with John Garza in May 2007, courtesy of Teachthefacts.org, Jim Kennedy, and Chris Grewell.
http://vigilance.teachthefacts.org/2007/05/newstalk-transcript-first-part.html


Sent: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:21 pm
Subject: Bethesda Magazine
All:
            On Sunday, the Sept/Oct. issue of Bethesda Magazine hit the newstands in Montgomery County.  In it, there is an article by Eugene Meyer entitled "Minority Retort:  How did so few people create such a ruckus over the county's new sex-ed curriculum?"   The article will not likely be on line until November, so I think there would be a serious copyright problems if it were to be posted on public web sites.  (The magazine is only 3 years old, and I suspect they would be very sensitive to such issues.  I know I would be were I its publisher.)

            The article has a pretty accurate description, as far as it goes, of what has been going on the last few years.  I see a few errors, but none are significant to our litigation concerns.  If you are interested in the atmospherics, however, read on.

             1.  While Meyer says I am 60, that is not yet true. I will not be 60 until mid-autumn. Sixty, hmmm. Well, as Satchel Paige said, "Age is mind over matter. If you don't mind, it don't matter."

             2.  John Garza is quoted as saying that I told him I am proud of my son who went to Princeton. A calumny. One of my sons went to Yale (and then Harvard Graduate School of Education), the other went to Penn -- Princeton's arch-rival. Should I demand a correction? :)

               3.  The Scopes Trial was in 1925, not 1924.  1924 is only an interesting date for Washingtonians because it is the only year a Washington baseball team won the World Series.  Perhaps that is what Meyer was thinking about.

              4.  Meyer also reports that Garza told him that he changed his mind about his suggestion that we have lunch and discuss our theological differences, saying that "I dont want to waste his time if he [Fishback] thinks he's going to save me." I found that curious, because I wrote to Garza saying I would be happy to continue our chat, as long as he did not think he was going to save ME. I have no illusions about changing John Garza's mind and heart, but it is always useful to learn other more about other people's perspectives.

              5.  The article quotes Garza as e-mailing the following to Meyer:  “I want to correct something David F. said a while ago.  God has never talked to me.”   Here, in fact, is the direct quote from the e-mail I sent to Meyer describing our post-NewTalk chat on May 1 (which I cc’ed to Garza): “John told me after the program that he personally does not care what individuals do with their lives, but for him, ‘If God tells me to walk on the left side of the road, I walk on the left side of the road.’  (John, if I have that quote wrong, please correct me.)”

 If Garza felt the need to clarify, fine.  But  he did not deny the quote and he did not have the courtesy to copy me with the e-mail.  Of course, this is typical of CRC tactics.  On March 29, 2007, I sent a letter to the State BOE in support of the MCPS decision and providing information on the AMA/AAP/APA positions on matters of sexual orientation – a letter I cc’ed to Garza.  Garza responded to Meyer,  but did not cc me.  I only found out about the letter several weeks later when it showed up on the CRC website.  I mentioned this to Garza after the NewsTalk show, and he blamed it on his secretary.  (This is lawyer talk for “the dog ate my homework.”)

              Of course, the theological exchanges I had with Garza are irrelevant to the litigation issues. 

               6.  As interesting as the main article is, I would principally recommend reading the side-bar interview with a health education teacher at B-CC High School. I am glad we have such teachers.

David

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Some relevant links


A comprehensive history of the ultimately unsuccessful effort by Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, whose President (and earlier, Vice President) and Legal Counsel was John Garza, to block progress on LGBTQ matters in MCPS, written in 2015, may be found at

https://pflag.org/sites/default/files/Curriculum%20Victory%20in%20Montgomery%20County%202.pdf


In addition these links from the decade of the battles in which Mr. Garza was the leader of the ultimately unsuccessful effort to block inclusion of the mainstream American medical and mental health professional association wisdom in the health education curriculum are instructive: 

2005:

March 


May


June 

2007:

February 

March


May
To get a sense of Mr. Garza’s mindset, see the transcript of his May 28, 2007 discussion of the MCPS curriculum on Bruce DuPuyt’s New Talk program.  http://vigilance.teachthefacts.org/2007/05/newstalk-transcript-first-part.html

June

2008:

February



March

2011:

April

2014:

May

Thursday, February 27, 2020

Finding Fellowship: The Must-See Film of 2020



Bill and Jane Phillips

On February 25,  Bobbi and I had a welcome respite from the politics of the day when we joined our good friends Jane and Bill Phillips for a Shrove Tuesday pancake dinner at their church, Fairhaven United Methodist in Darnestown, Maryland, followed by a viewing at nearby Quince Orchard High School of the documentary film Finding Fellowship.

In 1968, Fairhaven was formed by the merger of three shrinking Methodist congregations in Darnestown -- two white, one African American.  The Phillipses joined a decade later when they moved to Maryland, and have been fixtures there ever since.  In 1998, the Fairhaven Choir, Pearl Green (one of the Fairhaven founders), and Bill provided the centerpiece of our annual Martin Luther King Shabbat Service at Temple Emanuel in Kensington.

The film, produced by two of Pearl's grandchildren, Jason Green and Kisha Davis, is the fascinating story of the Quince Orchard community, Pleasant View Church (founded soon after the Civil War, and which was part of the 1968 merger), and Fairhaven's half century as an embodiment of what a multi-racial community can be. It also explored the Green family's own exploration of their ancestral roots in Quince Orchard, dating back to the time of slavery.

Jason Green with Jane and Bill Phillips

Shown at Quince Orchard High as part of the school's Black History Month celebrations, the film was informative, warm, and inspiring.  I am unable to express in words the beauty of the film and the panel discussion with current QO students.

I hope Finding Fellowship finds a nation-wide viewing audience.  Now more than ever, we need to experience this story of belonging. 

(For more about the film, go to https://findingfellowship.film/about-the-film/)




Friday, February 21, 2020

Danger in the proposal before the Montgomery County Charter Review Commission to change the structure of the County Council

Sometimes seemingly benign proposals can be very dangerous if implemented.


To: <charterreview.commission@montgomerycountymd.gov>

February 21, 2020

To:               County Charter Review Commission
From:          David S. Fishback, Olney MD
Re:              Proposal to alter the structure of the County Council

I have lived nearly my entire adult life in Montgomery County, and have lived in Olney since 1986.

I believe it would be a big mistake to move to a nine District Council, eliminating the At-Large seats.

The advantage of the current five District/four At-Large system is that it is more likely to reflect majority sentiment in the County.  The four at-large members are responsible to the entire electorate; the five district members are responsible only to the people in their districts.  The more districts and the fewer at-large districts, the more likely we could get a Council that would not reflect majority views on significant policy matters.  I recognize that smaller districts might lead to more responsiveness with respect to constituent service and might yield a greater diversity of ideas in the course of Council deliberations.  But for the reason explained below, I think that that argument is far outweighed by the impact of the current requirement of the “Ficker Amendment."

Under the  "Ficker Amendment" to the Charter, property tax rates may not be increased beyond inflation unless the Council unanimously approves such an increase.  Several years ago, County Executive Leggett correctly concluded that such an increase was absolutely necessary for the County to continue to be the kind of place we want to live in. After considerable discussion, the Council unanimously voted to approve the necessary tax package.

But if the Council had been splintered into nine districts, it would have been much more difficult, if not impossible, to secure that unanimity.  With more, and smaller, districts, it would have been more likely that a single Council member could have vetoed the overwhelming majority of sentiment in the County. 

A better case could be made for more, smaller district seats if the "Ficker Amendment" had not been passed. Indeed, one could make an argument that the Amendment it might not have passed if the Council structure had then consisted of nine smaller districts.  But unless and until the "Ficker Amendment" is repealed, splintering the Council into smaller districts would be a ticking, fundamentally undemocratic time-bomb, which could result in tragic consequences for our community.

Thursday, February 6, 2020

"At Temple Emanuel, learning in order to do": Washington Jewish Week on the 2020 Temple Emanuel MLK Service


At Temple Emanuel, learning in order to do

By David S. Fishback
For more than three decades, Temple Emanuel in Kensington has held services celebrating the life and work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at the beginning of MLK Weekend. It is an opportunity to remind ourselves of what still needs to be done to effectuate Dr. King’s
vision of creating a Beloved Community, locally, nationally and globally, and to advance the Jewish value of tikkun olam, repairing the world. To quote our prayer book, “Let us learn in order to do.”
This year, we invited Toni Holness, public policy director for the ACLU of Maryland, to speak on important human rights and civil liberties issues in this Maryland legislative session, and provide opportunities for action.
Holness, a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Temple Law School, has spent her entire career in public service. She said that her own immigrant experience and mixed roots drive her commitment to social justice.
A Jamaican immigrant who initially arrived in the United States to study, Holness told us that she became acutely aware that the immigration legal system was designed “about me and around me, but absolutely not for me or with my interests. These are laws that are designed to control the movement of immigrants in our country. They are not designed to
benefit immigrants.”
Any benefits that do come, she explained, often are dependent on “aggressive advocacy by allies, folks who have been born native to the U.S.” Holness said that chief among the ACLU’s 2020 statewide priorities is Trust Act legislation, which would disentangle local law enforcement activities from the misguided, draconian immigration policies that we are seeing coming from the federal government.
“Our local law enforcement resources and personnel who are sworn to serve our communities have no business enforcing federal immigration law or giving credibility to the Trump administration’s oppressive policies,” she said, calling it a matter of public safety and asking, rhetorically, if people living in immigrant communities will call local officers if they don’t know if the result will be to bring ICE authorities to their doorsteps.
She also discussed legislation to reverse a court decision allowing police departments to withhold information about officers’ misconduct. The ACLU is urging the General Assembly to change the law to let people know what happens to their complaints: As she explained, “Transparency is the threshold to accountability.”
She noted that many law enforcement officers support such legislation, and stressed that “we have really good officers, but there is often a culture discouraging accountability.”
Transparency will help improve the culture, she said, and will enable us all to better know the nature of the problems so that they can be remedied.
Holness described the ACLU’s efforts to provide meaningful access to the ballot to incarcerated persons who still have the right to vote — those who are held pretrial or whose most serious conviction is for a misdemeanor. Another ACLU initiative is to require that children undergoing questioning by law enforcement be provided an attorney, explaining that children are particularly vulnerable to influence by authority figures.
At the end of the talk, a 10-year-old member of the audience asked how to volunteer for the ACLU. Holness invited him to stay connected.
David Fishback, a longtime member of Temple Emanuel, has organized its MLK services since 1986.
https://washingtonjewishweek.com/63763/at-temple-emanuel-learning-in-order-to-do/editorial-opinion/?fbclid=IwAR2DfasD9rHQu1x-eh7LzpDMDnrtV3M3RBZNiopl0fa1djRIIE0LHphJkI8

"Conservatism sans compassion": Feb. 5, 2020 Letter to the Washington Post

(My letter in yesterday's Washington Post. The headline in the print edition (“Conservatism sans compassion”) is a more accurate description, I think, than the online headline.)
In his Jan. 31 op-ed, “The presidential contest the nation doesn’t need,” Michael Gerson argued that Trumpism is not “the culmination and embodiment of Republicanism and conservatism.” I feel bad for Mr. Gerson, whose career certainly suggests that he desperately wished to believe in “compassionate conservatism” as the linchpin of the Republican Party. I fear he is deluding himself.
�The past half-century of Republican policies and political positioning has been careening to this moment. When push has come to shove, Republican politicians increasingly, and now almost exclusively, have chosen conservatism without compassion — and, indeed, often conservatism with meanness. At best, Mr. Gerson could quote Robert Frost’s “The Road Not Taken.” The recent Republican congressional votes and arguments on impeachment confirm that the Republican Party has now unambiguously taken the Trump Road, and “that has made all the difference.”
David S. Fishback
Olney
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
President Trump speaks about the new North American trade agreement at Dana Incorporated in Warren, Mich., Thursday. (Evan Vucci/AP)By Letters to the Editor February 4, 2020 at 5:23 PM ESTIn his Jan. 31 op-ed, “The presidential contest the nation doesn’t need,” Michael Gerson argued that Trump...