Monday, January 15, 2018

County Executive Ike Leggett's Presentation at Temple Emanuel's 2018 MLK Service




On Friday, January 12, Temple Emanuel (Kensington MD) held its annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Shabbat Service.  We have been holding these services for more than 30 years.  The 2018 service was particularly special.  Our speaker was Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett, who is entering the last year of his third and final term as County Executive, and whose integrity, intelligence, wisdom, and plain speaking have made him such an effective leader in our Montgomery County Community for so many decades.  The County Executive gave one of the best presentations we have ever had the pleasure and honor to hear at our Temple.


Cantor Lindsay, Ike Leggett, me and my wife Bobbi

The first part of our service wove together traditional shabbat prayers, beautiful and meaningful music, and readings highlighting both the timelessness and timeliness of Dr. King's message.  The readings (which are copied below) were presented by members of the Kensington/North Chevy Chase Interfaith Consortium for Justice and Compassion, including the Temple's Community Social Action Council Chair Ian DeWaal, and by other members of our Temple Community, including members of our youth group.  This was the first MLK Service run by our new cantor, Cantor Lindsay Kanter.  She, along with the Kol Zimrah choir and the Mizmor L'Shabbat band, did a magnificent job.



Gracious as always, Ike opened his talk by telling the congregation that he had been to many Jewish services over the years, but "rarely have I ever heard such a cantor."  (This is what he told me while Cantor Lindsay was singing her first song earlier in the service.)

He then turned to the matters at hand:  "The last 24 hours shook me to my core."  Ike did not need to mention the President's most recent statements.  Ike quoted the words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel at a 1963 conference on Race and Religion:

"Few of us seem to realize how insidious, how radical, how universal and evil racism is.  Few of us realize that racism is man's greatest threat to man. It's a maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason; the maximum of cruelty for a minimum of thinking. Racism is an eye disease, a cancer of the soul."

 Rabbi Heschel, second from the right, marching with Dr. King in 1965.
Ike further quoted Rabbi Heschel's speech, noting that "to surrender to despair is to surrender to evil."  Like Rabbi Heschel, Ike urged that we not "wallow in despair."

Ike was a student leader and civil rights activist at Southern University in Louisiana in the early 1960s.  He recounted a meeting he and other young activists had with Dr. King.  Dr. King stressed three points to the students:  The wisdom of taking the pulpit to the streets, the necessity of adhering to non-violence, and the reality that the Movement faced a long struggle.  People, Dr. King explained, had to step forward in their communities.

When Ike moved to Montgomery County, he explained, he took Dr. King's advice to heart, and did, indeed, step forward in his community.  Serving as a member and then chair of the County Human Relations Commission, he ran for the County Council in 1986.  Through the primary election season, Ike recounted, his picture was not on any campaign material, although the text, describing his background, made it clear that he was African American.  After he won in the primary, his campaign materials included pictures, and he won overwhelmingly --  as he did over the last three decades in every one of his succeeding campaigns for the County Council and then for County Executive.

We have worked under Ike's leadership to make Montgomery County the kind of community that Dr. King would wish for us.  Ike's description of his political career is an indication of how far we have come.  But another story he told shows that we have still have a way to go.  In his last reelection campaign in 2014, he was following his long-standing tradition of checking out his campaign signs the night before the election at a particular location in the County.  In the dark, dressed in jeans and a sweater and wearing a baseball cap, a police car drove up and a young officer leaped out of the car and challenged him, asking belligerently what he was doing.  Ike froze.  Fortunately, a more senior officer got out of the car, and as she approached Ike she quickly recognized him.  She promptly admonished the rookie officer and apologized for the rookie's mistake.  After the incident, Ike related, he was torn between laughter and sadness:  Laughter because of how humorous the scene was as the senior officer had to dress down the rookie.  But sadness because, had Ike not been the County Executive but just another black man out at night, there could have been a more tragic outcome. Even in Montgomery County, in which so much progress has been made.


So, Ike asked, how do we more effectively manage change to effect Dr. King's vision?  First, we will fight back when things occur that threaten to roll back our progress.  We "cannot insulate ourselves from what our national leaders say."

Second, having earlier noted the diversity of our community -- "the world has come to Montgomery County" -- Ike, drawing on his Louisiana roots, spoke about the gumbo that is Montgomery County.  In a gumbo, there are many different ingredients, but they do not totally blend together to create a single taste or texture as in a soup.  Rather, they are held together by a roux, the liquid base which holds the wonderful flavors together.  "We can be a better community, we can be a model, with all of us in the gumbo" if we "love and respect one another."  But we have to act to keep the progress going.

Ike closed by quoting Rabbi Joachim Prinz.  At the March on Washington in August 1963, Rabbi Prinz, harkening back to his experience in Nazi Germany, told the assemblage that "The most important thing that I learned under those tragic circumstances was that bigotry and hatred are not the most urgent problem.  The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful and the most tragic problem is silence."

We, at Temple Emanuel, have been acting, and will continue to act.  We will not be silent.


READINGS FOR THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., SHABBAT SERVICE
TEMPLE EMANUEL,  JANUARY 12, 2018

PART I

READER:  Martin Luther King was a towering figure of the 20th Century, whose influence extended into our own Century. Not only did he lead the crusade for the non-violent dismantling of apartheid in our land, but his words and deeds inspired non-violent revolutions which led to successful democratic change in Eastern Europe, Asia, and South Africa.  Yet, today the progress of the past half-century is threatened by the dangerous forces of reaction.
           Dr. King expressed the sense of community that is so essential to a world made one:

CONGREGATION:  “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly.”

READER:  Our challenges are both tribal and economic.  Dr. King identified the challenges everyone on our planet still confronts:
           “Some years ago a famous novelist died. Among his papers was found a list of suggested plots for future stories, the most prominently underscored being this one: ‘A widely separated family inherits a house in which they have to live together.’ This is the great new problem of mankind.  We have inherited a large house, a great ‘world house’ in which we have to live together – black and while, Easterner and Westerner, Gentile and Jew, Catholic and Protestant, Moslem and Hindu – a family unduly separated in ideas, culture and interest, who, because we can never again live apart, must learn somehow to live with each other in peace.”
                          
CONGREGATION:  “If we are to have peace on earth, our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional.  Our loyalties must transcend our race, our tribe, our class, and our nation; and this means we must develop a world perspective.  Now the judgment of God is upon us, and we must either learn to live together as brothers or we are all going to perish together as fools.”

READER:  Dr. King understood that, here in America, we had a particular responsibility to transcend tribalism:
          “One day, here in America, I hope that we will . . . become one big family of Americans.  Not white Americans, not black Americans, not Jewish or Gentile Americans, not Irish or Italian Americans, not Mexican Americans, not Puerto Rican Americans, but just Americans.  One big family of Americans.”

CONGREGATION: “God somehow called America to do a special job for mankind and the world.  Never before in the history of the world have so many racial groups and so many national backgrounds assembled together in one nation.  And somehow if we can’t solve the problem in America, the world can’t solve the problem, because America is the world in miniature and the world is America writ large.” 

READER:  "And God set us out with all of the opportunities.  He set us between two great oceans; made it possible for us to live with some of the great natural resources of the world.  And there he gave us through the minds of our forefathers a great creed:  'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'"

PART II

READER:  Dr. King understood that if we did not overcome economic injustice, we would never fulfill the promise of America.
          Dr. King’s great ally and scholar of the Jewish Prophetic Tradition, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, spoke to these issues parallel to, and then with, Dr. King in the 1960s.  Rabbi Heschel reminded us that the “prophet was an individual who said ‘No’ to his society, condemning its habits and assumptions, its complacency.  The purpose of prophecy is to conquer callousnessto change the inner man as well as to revolutionize history." 

READER:  Here is how Rabbi Heschel described the time of the Prophet Amos: “There was pride, plenty, and splendor in the land, elegance in the cities, and might in the palaces. The rich had their summer and winter palaces adorned with costly ivory, gorgeous couches with damask pillows, on which they reclined at their sumptuous feasts. [But at] the same time there was no justice in the land, the poor were afflicted.”

READER:  A half-century ago, Dr. King was preparing The Poor People’s Campaign, in which thousands of people would come to, and stay in, Washington to seek to turn the attention of the nation to the economic problems which kept so many in poverty. It was to be a call to America to shed its complacency and to act.
          It was a time both similar to and different from today. Writ large, our economy then seemed prosperous. But the poor were mired in poverty.  And, today, the middle class is fearful of its economic future.

READER:  On March 25, 1968, Dr. King spoke to the annual conference of the Rabbinical Assembly of Conservative Judaism, where he was introduced by Rabbi Heschel.  Dr. King eloquently reminded the assemblage that “[w]e are dealing with the problem of poverty. We must be sure that the people of our country will see this as a matter of justice.”
          Six days after he spoke to the Rabbinical Assembly, Dr. King gave, at the National Cathedral here in Washington, what would be his last Sunday sermon.  He
observed  that America had the “opportunity to help bridge the gulf between the haves and the have-nots. The question is whether America will do it. There is nothing new about poverty. What is new is that we now have the techniques and the resources to get rid of poverty. The real question is whether we have the will."
          In closing, Dr. King recognized the difficulties of the endeavor, but said:

CONGREGATION:  “I will not yield to a politic of despair. I’m going to maintain hope as we come to Washington in this campaign. . . . God grant that we will be that David of truth set out against the Goliath of injustice, the Goliath of neglect, the Goliath of refusing to deal with the problems, and go on with the determination to make America the truly great America that it is called to be.” 

READER:  A few days later, Dr. King was assassinated.  Prophets typically do not see fulfillment of their visions in their own times. Dr. King saw the beginning of the dismantling of American apartheid, but did not see the elimination of apartheid’s effects. His vision for a just America went beyond issues of racism, and extended to economic injustice.  
          Dr. King's vision was rooted in our own religious traditions:  He often quoted from Amos (5:24),

CONGREGATION:  "We are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied, until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream."

READER:  Dr. King often proclaimed that the "arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."  But he also knew that only through the work of our own hands would the world become a better place: 

CONGREGATION:  "Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable. . . .  No social advance rolls in on the wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts and persistent work of dedicated individuals, who are willing to be co-workers with God."

READER:  Dr. King’s words, actions, and vision, like the Exodus story, must be told to every generation, and must be seen not just as history, but as a lesson for the present and the future.  Dr. King’s teachings were a way of stating the Jewish concept of Tikkun Olam – humankind’s effort to repair the world. They are lessons for us all.

CONGREGATION:
Let us learn in order to teach.
Let us learn in order to do.





Thursday, January 11, 2018

Lessons for the Resistance at the End of Year One



The most recent  Quinnipiac Poll released yesterday includes some very interesting comparisons of the public’s view of President Trump between 2017 and 2018.   First, I think it is important to look at the last question:

"If the Democratic Party wins control of the House of Representatives in 2018, would you like to see them begin the process to impeach President Trump, or not?"

51% of the respondents say NO, 45% say YES.  While 51% of women say YES, 59% of men say NO.  Since we are not going to alter the 19th Amendment to deprive men of the right to vote (as tempting as that might be),  the 2018 Democratic Campaign should not harp on the impeachment issue.  As tempting as it is to turn all our energy to immediate removal of the Colluder in Chief,  the cowardice of the Republican Senators precludes us getting to the 2/3 of the Senate necessary to convict.  And even if we could, that would simply brings us into the Mike Pence Oval Office, which may be even worse.  The work of the Special Counsel will bring Trump down even further than he is.  But until that work is done, we should let the work speak for itself.  (Just as the legitimacy of the 1974 removal of Nixon was secured because Republican Congressional Leadership called for it, the same applies today.)  And the polling shows that we have a much better way to defeat the Trumplicans than impeachment -- a way that does not allow Trump to play the victim and further inflame his potentially dangerous base.

Check out these comparisons between January 2017, when Trump was inaugurated and January 2018, after nearly a year in office:

In January 2017, his approval numbers were 36% Approval/44% Disapprove/19% Neither or Don’t Know.  In January 2018, the numbers at 36%/59%/5%.  Remember that Trump received 46% of the popular vote in 2016; so 20% of those who voted for him were likely in the Neither or Don’t Know column of Approval by Inauguration.  It appears that while Trump has not lost his core base of approval (36%), most of those withholding judgment a year ago now disapprove.  A candidate who receives 46% of the popular vote, and then loses 20% of that support before he even takes office is in a terrible position.  The fact that he has made essentially no gains from his January 2017 popularity is devastating  for Trump and his allies, unless Trump can turn that around, or so depress a huge portion of the 59% of the electorate who disapprove that they abandon politics altogether.  

The 2017/2018 comparison whether Trump is perceived to be Honest are even more stark, going from 39 YES/54 NO/5  Neither or Don't Know to 34/63/3. 

Trump started out a bit better as to whether he has Good Leadership Skills, beginning at  49/46/5.  That has slid to 39-59-2.

In response to the question of whether Trump Cares About Average Americans, the numbers have gone from 44/53/3 to 38/59/2.  So now his Disapproval Rating is the same as his Cares About Average Americans Rating.  This number ventures into landslide loss territory if it stands up in 2018 for Trumplican candidates and Trump himself in 2020. 

The next question is even more significant now than it was in January 2017, given the saber rattling with respect to North Korea: Is Trump Level-Headed?  A year ago it was 33-62-5; now it is 28/69/2.

The last question with January 2017 to January 2018 comparisons is whether Trump Shares Your Values. The results have gone from 38/58/4 to 32/65/2.

In January 2017, Quinnipiac did not even bother to pose a question of whether Trump is Fit to Serve as President. This month, the result is 40/57/2.

So, to summarize, Donald Trump's levels of support which were gawd-awful low when he was inaugurated have only gotten worse – much worse.  59% of the people do not approve of his performance in office, 63% do not believe he is honest, 59% do not believe he is a good leader, 59% do not think he cares about average Americans, 69% do not think he is level-headed, 65% do not think he shares their values, and 57% do not think he is fit to serve as President of the United States.

Still, Democrats should not get overconfident.  It will take hard work and good candidates to save the nation from Trumpism.  Trump is pulling out every page of the authoritarian’s cookbook in inflaming and motivating his 1/3 base, in seeking to undermine people’s confidence in all American institutions, and in seeking to convince the 3/5 to 2/3 of the electorate who are fed up with him that they should just give up in the face of his awesomeness.  He will lie and mislead and then lie again.  Not just The Big Lie.  But The Big Lies.  His theory is that Americans are just as gullible as Germans were in 1933.

Trump and the Trumplicans try to divide us; we cannot let them succeed.  Whatever issues may divide the 3/5, they are dwarfed by what the current Administration is doing to us.  To quote Ben Franklin, who, in 1787, told a citizen that the Constitutional Convention had given America “a Republic, if you can keep it,” also warned a dozen years earlier that “we must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.”




Thursday, December 28, 2017

MLK Service at Temple Emanuel, Friday evening, Jan. 12 at 7:30pm



Implementing Dr. King's Vision: What We Have Done in Montgomery County, and What We Need To Do in the Future. 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE IKE LEGGETT TO SPEAK AT THE ANNUAL MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., SHABBAT SERVICE – FRIDAY, JANUARY 12

The Temple is honored this year to have Montgomery County Executive Isiah (Ike) Leggett as the guest speaker for our annual Martin Luther King, Jr., Commemorative Shabbat Service, to be held Friday, January 12.  The Service will begin at 7:30 pm.

     Ike Leggett last spoke at our MLK Service in 2004.  Elected as County Executive in 2006 and re-elected in 2010 and 2014, he is now completing his last year in office.  This will be an appropriate time to both look back and look forward.  His topic will be Implementing Dr. King's Vision: What We Have Done in Montgomery County, and What We Need To Do in the Future. 

    Growing up as the seventh of 12 children in a four-room house without indoor plumbing, Ike worked his way through Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where he was elected student body president and commanded the school’s Reserve Officer Training Corps, while at the same time organizing for civil rights.  Following his 1967 graduation, he served as a Captain in the United States Army, where he earned the Bronze Star Medal in Viet Nam.  Finishing first in his class at Howard University Law School in 1974, he worked as an attorney for the Department of the Navy and later joined the Howard Law faculty, where he served until 2006, taking time out in 1978 and 1979 to serve as a White House Fellow.  In 1981, Ike was appointed to the Montgomery County Human Relations Commission, becoming its chair in 1983, and serving on the Commission until his election to the County Council in 1986. He served on the County Council through 2002, including three years as Council President, and then was chair of the Maryland State Democratic Party from 2002 through 2004.

    The breadth of his commitment to social justice and the ideals of Dr. King are further illustrated by his participation on the boards of directors of the Jewish Foundation for Group Homes of Maryland, Metro DC PFLAG, the African American Business Council of Montgomery County, the Montgomery County Boys & Girls Clubs of America, the Washington Area Housing Partnership, and the
 Montgomery County Boys and Girls Club. In 2007, he was the recipient of the first King-Heschel award from the Jewish Community Relations Council.

    There is no one better in our community than County Executive Leggett to help us celebrate the life and work of Dr. King, and to discuss the challenges ahead as we work to create a better country and world.  Please join us on January 12.

    We ask that people bring to the service non-perishable food for Manna Food Center.  As always a box for contributions is outside HaMakom.

     THE TEMPLE IS LOCATED AT 10101 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, KENSINGTON MD, ABOUT A MILE NORTH OF THE BELTWAY.

When the phony "War on Christmas" starts to become an actual War on 30% of the American Population.

A recent Pew Research Center study reveals that the percentage of Americans who identify as Christian dropped to about 70% in 2015. What happens when a demagogic President decides he can gain advantage by telling the 70% that they are under siege from the "others"?

As a Jew, when I was growing up in Silver Spring MD in the 1950s and early 1960s, I had the feeling that when people said "Merry Christmas," it was never out of malice, but just out of the sense that virtually everyone in their communities was Christian, and it was just a way of being friendly. This felt true even though a significant percentage of the people in my neighborhoods were also Jewish.

I never experienced anti-semitism that I could not easily shrug it off. And on the rare occasions when I was older and out in the world, those rare instances when something came up that could be deemed serious anti-semitism never really bothered me because, in late 20th Century America, being Jewish never was something that disadvantaged me. Indeed, I felt "culturally advantaged" because the Jewish culture in which I grew up fostered education, which turned out to be a very useful tool in navigating and progressing in America. And, in truth, this was the era in which, as with other immigrants before us, "Jews became White" in the view of the majority cultures. When Presidents said "Merry Christmas," it did not seem like an attack; and when they also said "Happy Holidays," they were affirmatively recognizing that we ALL belonged.

As American society became less overwhelmingly Christian, it became more polite to say "Happy Holidays," which encompassed not only Christmas and Chanukah, but also Kwanza and the totally secular and universal New Year's Day. It was not "politically correct." Rather, it was simply a matter of being inclusive.

But as people like the very un-Christian Bill O'Reilly at Fox sought to play on fears of White people (most of whom identified as Christian), they attacked the use of "Happy Holidays" as somehow an attack on Christians. This became a key factor in the culture of victimization, in which some politicians and right-wing groups sought to convince members of the dominant White culture (particularly those whose economic prospects declined as America lost its post-World War II economic advantages once other countries recovered from the War and were able to begin catching up with us) that they were under attack from "elites" (aka, Jews and "intellectuals") who looked down on them.

Still, this phony "War on Christmas" was more a joke than a threat until the leadership of the "defenders" of Christmas devolved to someone with true demagogic skills and a huge platform: Donald Trump.

When Donald Trump says "Merry Christmas," he seemingly always follows up with a comment like, "Isn't it great that now we can say 'Merry Christmas.'" The tone of voice and, most significantly, the snide remarks, turn the benign "Merry Christmas" into a weapon. He is not simply wishing the 70% of Americans who identify as Christian a joyous Christian holiday, but he is telling them that the Jews and the Muslims and the "intellectual elites" have been oppressing them, and that now he -- Donald Trump -- has saved them from these people who, in fact, only reside here by the sufferance of the "real" Americans (aka, White Christians).

As a Jew born in this country shortly after the Holocaust, my view of America included the sense of good fortune that I was born here, in this time and place. I never felt that anyone in the White House was out to marginalize me, or to turn my fellow citizens against me. But now, in the Age of Trump, I am beginning to experience what other minority groups have been exposed to for years (albeit not as overtly in the last half century as before): the potential danger posed by fellow citizens who are told that I am not truly or fully American and that I am their enemy.

In truth, I do not have fear about this deep in my bones. My optimism about America is too pervasive for that. But it is hard to watch what is happening now and not be very concerned that my faith in my fellow citizens may be in jeopardy if Trumpism deepens its hold.